Category: 1031 Exchange General

  • Divorce, Death & Tax Deferral Under IRC Section 1031

    Divorce, Death & Tax Deferral Under IRC Section 1031

    At times, in the course of real estate ownership, an involuntary transfer of title the property occurs. A couple’s divorce generally results in the property being sold to a third party or one of the former spouses conveying the property to the other spouse. Also, a spouse may pass away during the period between the sale of a relinquished property and purchase of a replacement property. What is the effect on 1031 exchanges of these changes in legal ownership?
    If a divorced couple wishes to sell an investment/business use property to a third party, there are no real issues for a 1031 exchange. Regardless of having been joint tenants and filing taxes jointly, each spouse may do their own exchange or cash out. Typically, the joint tenancy would have been severed as part of the divorce proceeding. The title can also be severed prior to a divorce, by one joint tenant by signing a deed naming the grantor spouse as the transferee of the one half tenancy-in-common interest.
    At times, part of a divorce settlement agreement will provide that one spouse transfers to the other spouse the interest of the exiting spouse. Under

  • Divorce, Death & Tax Deferral Under IRC Section 1031

    Divorce, Death & Tax Deferral Under IRC Section 1031

    At times, in the course of real estate ownership, an involuntary transfer of title the property occurs. A couple’s divorce generally results in the property being sold to a third party or one of the former spouses conveying the property to the other spouse. Also, a spouse may pass away during the period between the sale of a relinquished property and purchase of a replacement property. What is the effect on 1031 exchanges of these changes in legal ownership?
    If a divorced couple wishes to sell an investment/business use property to a third party, there are no real issues for a 1031 exchange. Regardless of having been joint tenants and filing taxes jointly, each spouse may do their own exchange or cash out. Typically, the joint tenancy would have been severed as part of the divorce proceeding. The title can also be severed prior to a divorce, by one joint tenant by signing a deed naming the grantor spouse as the transferee of the one half tenancy-in-common interest.
    At times, part of a divorce settlement agreement will provide that one spouse transfers to the other spouse the interest of the exiting spouse. Under

  • Seller Financing in Today’s Real Estate Market

    Seller Financing in Today’s Real Estate Market

    What is Seller Financing?
    Simply put, seller financing is when the Seller of a property lends the funds for the purchase of the property to the Buyer, rather than the Buyer acquiring the funds through a financial institution. Read this blog for a more detailed explanation of Seller Financing.
    Reasons for Seller Financing
    There are many reasons why Seller Financing may be considered in a real estate transaction. Some of the most common reasons could include:

    A more favorable interest rate through Seller Financing due to increasing interest rates at financial institutions
    Both parties want a quick transaction and the financial institution’s loan process will take too long
    Buyer wants a short-term note, for example 6 months, and the financial institution requires a longer term
    Buyer has poor credit hindering a loan from a financial institution
    Seller is eager to sell the property and offers Seller Financing to encourage a Buyer who might be otherwise hesitate due to high interest rates

    Advantages of Seller Financing
    A transaction utilizing Seller Financing can be mutually beneficial to both the Buyer and the Seller of a real estate transaction. One shared benefit of Seller Financing is that the real estate transaction could be completed in a much speedier manner without third party lending.
    Some other advantages for the Seller and Buyer include:
    Advantages of Seller Financing for the Seller

    Lending the money to the Buyer could allow the Seller to earn more money on their funds than they would by depositing the money into a traditional savings account
    Seller Financing allows the Seller to have more control over the entire real estate transaction. They know the financing is there so some of the question marks, issues, etc. that could arise with third party lending will not be a factor
    Should the Buyer default on the loan, the Seller can foreclose on the loan and potential receive their property back without the need to return any previous payments

    Advantages of Buyer Financing for the Buyer

    The Buyer may get a lower interest rate, or other more favorable terms, with the Seller than through a financial institution
    The loan process with the Seller could be much less complicated than the loan process through a financial institution
    Reduced closing costs could be associated with Seller Financing • Seller Financing could allow for a more flexible or lower down payment

    Example of Seller Financing
    Here is a basic example of how Seller Financing can be mutually beneficial financially for both the Buyer and the Seller of the real estate transaction.
    Typical savings account interest rate – 0.5%
    Average financial institution loan interest rate – 4%
    Loan Amount – $500,000
    If the Seller deposited their $500,000 in a savings account at a financial institution, he would earn $2500 in interest over a full year. However, if the Seller offered the Buyer an interest rate of 2% on a loan of $500,000, the Seller would earn $10,000 in interest over a year on the loan. Alternatively, if the Buyer got a loan from a financial institution at 4%, he would pay $20,000 in interest over a year to the financial institution, but he would only be paying $10,000 in interest should he accept Seller Financing at the discounted interest rate of 2%.
    There are additional considerations for Seller financing as part of a 1031 exchange. Learn more about them in this blog article. 

  • Seller Financing in Today’s Real Estate Market

    Seller Financing in Today’s Real Estate Market

    What is Seller Financing?
    Simply put, seller financing is when the Seller of a property lends the funds for the purchase of the property to the Buyer, rather than the Buyer acquiring the funds through a financial institution. Read this blog for a more detailed explanation of Seller Financing.
    Reasons for Seller Financing
    There are many reasons why Seller Financing may be considered in a real estate transaction. Some of the most common reasons could include:

    A more favorable interest rate through Seller Financing due to increasing interest rates at financial institutions
    Both parties want a quick transaction and the financial institution’s loan process will take too long
    Buyer wants a short-term note, for example 6 months, and the financial institution requires a longer term
    Buyer has poor credit hindering a loan from a financial institution
    Seller is eager to sell the property and offers Seller Financing to encourage a Buyer who might be otherwise hesitate due to high interest rates

    Advantages of Seller Financing
    A transaction utilizing Seller Financing can be mutually beneficial to both the Buyer and the Seller of a real estate transaction. One shared benefit of Seller Financing is that the real estate transaction could be completed in a much speedier manner without third party lending.
    Some other advantages for the Seller and Buyer include:
    Advantages of Seller Financing for the Seller

    Lending the money to the Buyer could allow the Seller to earn more money on their funds than they would by depositing the money into a traditional savings account
    Seller Financing allows the Seller to have more control over the entire real estate transaction. They know the financing is there so some of the question marks, issues, etc. that could arise with third party lending will not be a factor
    Should the Buyer default on the loan, the Seller can foreclose on the loan and potential receive their property back without the need to return any previous payments

    Advantages of Buyer Financing for the Buyer

    The Buyer may get a lower interest rate, or other more favorable terms, with the Seller than through a financial institution
    The loan process with the Seller could be much less complicated than the loan process through a financial institution
    Reduced closing costs could be associated with Seller Financing • Seller Financing could allow for a more flexible or lower down payment

    Example of Seller Financing
    Here is a basic example of how Seller Financing can be mutually beneficial financially for both the Buyer and the Seller of the real estate transaction.
    Typical savings account interest rate – 0.5%
    Average financial institution loan interest rate – 4%
    Loan Amount – $500,000
    If the Seller deposited their $500,000 in a savings account at a financial institution, he would earn $2500 in interest over a full year. However, if the Seller offered the Buyer an interest rate of 2% on a loan of $500,000, the Seller would earn $10,000 in interest over a year on the loan. Alternatively, if the Buyer got a loan from a financial institution at 4%, he would pay $20,000 in interest over a year to the financial institution, but he would only be paying $10,000 in interest should he accept Seller Financing at the discounted interest rate of 2%.
    There are additional considerations for Seller financing as part of a 1031 exchange. Learn more about them in this blog article. 

  • Seller Financing in Today’s Real Estate Market

    Seller Financing in Today’s Real Estate Market

    What is Seller Financing?
    Simply put, seller financing is when the Seller of a property lends the funds for the purchase of the property to the Buyer, rather than the Buyer acquiring the funds through a financial institution. Read this blog for a more detailed explanation of Seller Financing.
    Reasons for Seller Financing
    There are many reasons why Seller Financing may be considered in a real estate transaction. Some of the most common reasons could include:

    A more favorable interest rate through Seller Financing due to increasing interest rates at financial institutions
    Both parties want a quick transaction and the financial institution’s loan process will take too long
    Buyer wants a short-term note, for example 6 months, and the financial institution requires a longer term
    Buyer has poor credit hindering a loan from a financial institution
    Seller is eager to sell the property and offers Seller Financing to encourage a Buyer who might be otherwise hesitate due to high interest rates

    Advantages of Seller Financing
    A transaction utilizing Seller Financing can be mutually beneficial to both the Buyer and the Seller of a real estate transaction. One shared benefit of Seller Financing is that the real estate transaction could be completed in a much speedier manner without third party lending.
    Some other advantages for the Seller and Buyer include:
    Advantages of Seller Financing for the Seller

    Lending the money to the Buyer could allow the Seller to earn more money on their funds than they would by depositing the money into a traditional savings account
    Seller Financing allows the Seller to have more control over the entire real estate transaction. They know the financing is there so some of the question marks, issues, etc. that could arise with third party lending will not be a factor
    Should the Buyer default on the loan, the Seller can foreclose on the loan and potential receive their property back without the need to return any previous payments

    Advantages of Buyer Financing for the Buyer

    The Buyer may get a lower interest rate, or other more favorable terms, with the Seller than through a financial institution
    The loan process with the Seller could be much less complicated than the loan process through a financial institution
    Reduced closing costs could be associated with Seller Financing • Seller Financing could allow for a more flexible or lower down payment

    Example of Seller Financing
    Here is a basic example of how Seller Financing can be mutually beneficial financially for both the Buyer and the Seller of the real estate transaction.
    Typical savings account interest rate – 0.5%
    Average financial institution loan interest rate – 4%
    Loan Amount – $500,000
    If the Seller deposited their $500,000 in a savings account at a financial institution, he would earn $2500 in interest over a full year. However, if the Seller offered the Buyer an interest rate of 2% on a loan of $500,000, the Seller would earn $10,000 in interest over a year on the loan. Alternatively, if the Buyer got a loan from a financial institution at 4%, he would pay $20,000 in interest over a year to the financial institution, but he would only be paying $10,000 in interest should he accept Seller Financing at the discounted interest rate of 2%.
    There are additional considerations for Seller financing as part of a 1031 exchange. Learn more about them in this blog article. 

  • Questions to Ask When Evaluating DST Offerings

    The raised $1.7 billion through February 2022, putting it on pace to be one of the largest years on record for DST offerings. There is no surprise that the DST market is heating up. As more and more deals become available, investors are looking for ways to defer their capital gains and benefit from the passive nature of DSTs. Although DSTs have been well received by investors as a replacement property option for 1031 exchanges, this type of investment should be more than a “plug-and-play” scenario. With the high velocity of deals and sometimes limited supply available in the market, performing the proper due diligence can help an investor ensure they aren’t exposing themselves to an unnecessary amount of risk.
    In order to help you as an investor determine the good deals from the bad, Realized has provided a list of some of the questions you should consider before investing in a DST.
    What Should You Know Before Investing?
    Although DST offerings pass through several hands before making their way to investors, it is important to have a grasp on exactly what you’re entering into. Knowing and evaluating the details around a potential DST investment may keep you out of an unnecessarily risky offering. Here are some of the questions to ask when evaluating a DST offering:

    Who is the Sponsor and what is their track record? Has the Sponsor had experience with this type of investment? How has the Sponsor managed investments in different points of the real estate cycle? Although the internet is helpful in researching a Sponsor’s background, every offering memorandum includes the Sponsor’s prior performance. However, past performance does not guarantee future results.
     
    Are the projected financials reasonable? Returns are projected and based off a Sponsor’s own models and assumptions as to how a particular property will perform. These projections try to predict rent growth and occupancy levels, and there is typically no context to their underwriting. Referring to market reports and appraisals is a good first step in determining whether a deal’s financial projections are reasonable.
     
    What do the fees look like? Almost every Sponsor will take certain fees such as an acquisition fee, a disposition fee, and an asset management fee. Assess the competitiveness of these fees to determine if they will detract from your return.
     
    What is the intended exit strategy? As DSTs have gained popularity in the 1031 space, Sponsors have developed new ways to exit an investment. Sponsors utilize both third-party sales and Realized to learn more about their due diligence and portfolio construction methodologies.
     
    This material is for general information and educational purposes only. Information is based on data gathered from what we believe are reliable sources. It is not guaranteed as to accuracy, does not purport to be complete and is not intended to be used as a primary basis for investment decisions. It should also not be construed as advice meeting the particular investment needs of any investor.
    Realized does not provide tax or legal advice. This material is not a substitute for seeking the advice of a qualified professional for your individual situation.

  • Questions to Ask When Evaluating DST Offerings

    The raised $1.7 billion through February 2022, putting it on pace to be one of the largest years on record for DST offerings. There is no surprise that the DST market is heating up. As more and more deals become available, investors are looking for ways to defer their capital gains and benefit from the passive nature of DSTs. Although DSTs have been well received by investors as a replacement property option for 1031 exchanges, this type of investment should be more than a “plug-and-play” scenario. With the high velocity of deals and sometimes limited supply available in the market, performing the proper due diligence can help an investor ensure they aren’t exposing themselves to an unnecessary amount of risk.
    In order to help you as an investor determine the good deals from the bad, Realized has provided a list of some of the questions you should consider before investing in a DST.
    What Should You Know Before Investing?
    Although DST offerings pass through several hands before making their way to investors, it is important to have a grasp on exactly what you’re entering into. Knowing and evaluating the details around a potential DST investment may keep you out of an unnecessarily risky offering. Here are some of the questions to ask when evaluating a DST offering:

    Who is the Sponsor and what is their track record? Has the Sponsor had experience with this type of investment? How has the Sponsor managed investments in different points of the real estate cycle? Although the internet is helpful in researching a Sponsor’s background, every offering memorandum includes the Sponsor’s prior performance. However, past performance does not guarantee future results.
     
    Are the projected financials reasonable? Returns are projected and based off a Sponsor’s own models and assumptions as to how a particular property will perform. These projections try to predict rent growth and occupancy levels, and there is typically no context to their underwriting. Referring to market reports and appraisals is a good first step in determining whether a deal’s financial projections are reasonable.
     
    What do the fees look like? Almost every Sponsor will take certain fees such as an acquisition fee, a disposition fee, and an asset management fee. Assess the competitiveness of these fees to determine if they will detract from your return.
     
    What is the intended exit strategy? As DSTs have gained popularity in the 1031 space, Sponsors have developed new ways to exit an investment. Sponsors utilize both third-party sales and Realized to learn more about their due diligence and portfolio construction methodologies.
     
    This material is for general information and educational purposes only. Information is based on data gathered from what we believe are reliable sources. It is not guaranteed as to accuracy, does not purport to be complete and is not intended to be used as a primary basis for investment decisions. It should also not be construed as advice meeting the particular investment needs of any investor.
    Realized does not provide tax or legal advice. This material is not a substitute for seeking the advice of a qualified professional for your individual situation.

  • Questions to Ask When Evaluating DST Offerings

    The raised $1.7 billion through February 2022, putting it on pace to be one of the largest years on record for DST offerings. There is no surprise that the DST market is heating up. As more and more deals become available, investors are looking for ways to defer their capital gains and benefit from the passive nature of DSTs. Although DSTs have been well received by investors as a replacement property option for 1031 exchanges, this type of investment should be more than a “plug-and-play” scenario. With the high velocity of deals and sometimes limited supply available in the market, performing the proper due diligence can help an investor ensure they aren’t exposing themselves to an unnecessary amount of risk.
    In order to help you as an investor determine the good deals from the bad, Realized has provided a list of some of the questions you should consider before investing in a DST.
    What Should You Know Before Investing?
    Although DST offerings pass through several hands before making their way to investors, it is important to have a grasp on exactly what you’re entering into. Knowing and evaluating the details around a potential DST investment may keep you out of an unnecessarily risky offering. Here are some of the questions to ask when evaluating a DST offering:

    Who is the Sponsor and what is their track record? Has the Sponsor had experience with this type of investment? How has the Sponsor managed investments in different points of the real estate cycle? Although the internet is helpful in researching a Sponsor’s background, every offering memorandum includes the Sponsor’s prior performance. However, past performance does not guarantee future results.
     
    Are the projected financials reasonable? Returns are projected and based off a Sponsor’s own models and assumptions as to how a particular property will perform. These projections try to predict rent growth and occupancy levels, and there is typically no context to their underwriting. Referring to market reports and appraisals is a good first step in determining whether a deal’s financial projections are reasonable.
     
    What do the fees look like? Almost every Sponsor will take certain fees such as an acquisition fee, a disposition fee, and an asset management fee. Assess the competitiveness of these fees to determine if they will detract from your return.
     
    What is the intended exit strategy? As DSTs have gained popularity in the 1031 space, Sponsors have developed new ways to exit an investment. Sponsors utilize both third-party sales and Realized to learn more about their due diligence and portfolio construction methodologies.
     
    This material is for general information and educational purposes only. Information is based on data gathered from what we believe are reliable sources. It is not guaranteed as to accuracy, does not purport to be complete and is not intended to be used as a primary basis for investment decisions. It should also not be construed as advice meeting the particular investment needs of any investor.
    Realized does not provide tax or legal advice. This material is not a substitute for seeking the advice of a qualified professional for your individual situation.

  • Seller Financing as Part of a 1031 Exchange

    Seller Financing as Part of a 1031 Exchange

    Seller financing comes up most frequently where the seller is the taxpayer under an exchange, and the taxpayer is providing some seller financing to the buyer. However, it can also come up where the taxpayer is receiving seller financing from the seller of the replacement property.
    What is seller financing?
    Seller financing occurs when a person selling real estate is willing to let the purchaser pay the purchase price over time. This can be done for a wide variety of reasons such as the buyer cannot qualify for a conventional loan, or the economics of the deal require a lower interest rate compared to an outside lender. In this case the seller “holds the paper” requiring the taxpayer to pay the seller over time on specified terms. In general, it will also allow the seller to report the income from the periodic payments in the year in which they are received rather than all in the year of an outright sale.
    How does seller financing work?
    Seller financing can be structured in a couple of ways. One allows the buyer to receive title to the property at the time of closing and the other allows the buyer to take title upon payment of the last installment. More specifically, the first way would be documented with a promissory note from the buyer to the seller. This note would specify the interest rate, the length of time over which the loan was amortized, and the monthly payment amount. The note would typically be secured by a mortgage in favor of the seller as a lien against the property. In some jurisdictions the security interest used may be referred to as a trust deed or deed of trust.
    The second way of documenting the transaction would entail some kind of installment contract between the parties. Again, there are regional differences regarding the name of that contract. It can be called an Installment Agreement for Deed or a Contract for Deed or Articles of Agreement for Deed. For tax and exchange purposes they are all the same. Generally, there would be some money paid down from the buyer to the seller and the balance financed over time. Sometimes it will be paid off at the time of the last fixed payment and in other instances it has a balloon payment for the final lump sum.
    Whether the transaction is documented by a deed transfer at the time of the initial closing and secured by a note and mortgage or the deed passing upon final payment the tax treatment is the same. The buyer still owns the property either way, but subject to all payments being made. An analogy can be made to buying a new car with some dealer financing. In the case of an installment contract, the buyer owns the car but will not get clear title until it is paid off.
    Regardless of the structure, the documents should show the funds payable to the Qualified Intermediary. Funds paid to the taxpayer would constitute “boot” and therefore taxable.
    How does seller financing work with an exchange if the taxpayer is financing the buyer?
    This can be a bit tricky. For §1031 purposes, a taxpayer only has 180 days from the date of sale of the relinquished property to acquire the replacement property. For there to be total tax deferral, the full value of the sale property must be reinvested into the replacement property. But when seller financing is involved, the seller does not have the full value to roll over. There are times when the full value will be paid into the exchange account within the 180 day window but more often than not, it will be paid after the 180 day exchange period. So, payments coming into the exchange account can be used towards the acquisition of replacement property, but funds payable after that 180 day term cannot.
    Although there are various ways to deal with this, the most common one is for the seller to “advance” the balance due for the replacement property with personal funds. Those funds can come from the taxpayer directly or can be borrowed by the taxpayer. The exchange balance plus the additional funds are used to acquire the replacement property. The note and mortgage or the installment sale agreement is then assigned from the Qualified Intermediary to the taxpayer. Since the necessary value was invested on a timely basis into the replacement property, the receipt by the taxpayer of principal payments over time under the financing document are not taxable.
    How does seller financing work with an exchange if the taxpayer is receiving financing from the Seller?
    This situation is not as complicated as when the taxpayer is financing the buyer. In any exchange, in order to have complete deferral, a taxpayer has to reinvest all the net proceeds from the sale and have equal or greater new debt compared to debt paid off at the relinquished property closing. Debt in the form of the balance due under the seller financing structure counts just like conventional financing, so it would typically offset the debt requirement to have equal or greater debt on the replacement property.
    In summary, seller financing is a part of many real estate transactions. However, due to the rules around §1031 exchanges, some special steps need to be taken on account of the seller financing. If the taxpayer is selling, the loan must be documented so that the exchange company is the payee of the loan, and the applicable security interest should correspond. Once the loan document is monetized from a cash infusion by the taxpayer, the necessary amount can be exchanged into the replacement property. Ultimately, the security interest is assigned to the taxpayer and the taxpayer will not recognize any tax on the principal received over time due to the advancement of the funds at the time of the exchange. In the event the taxpayer is receiving the seller financing in connection with the purchase of the replacement property, such debt obligation is treated no differently than any other loan from a conventional financing source. The seller financing debt will offset debt paid off upon closing of the relinquished property.

  • Seller Financing as Part of a 1031 Exchange

    Seller Financing as Part of a 1031 Exchange

    Seller financing comes up most frequently where the seller is the taxpayer under an exchange, and the taxpayer is providing some seller financing to the buyer. However, it can also come up where the taxpayer is receiving seller financing from the seller of the replacement property.
    What is seller financing?
    Seller financing occurs when a person selling real estate is willing to let the purchaser pay the purchase price over time. This can be done for a wide variety of reasons such as the buyer cannot qualify for a conventional loan, or the economics of the deal require a lower interest rate compared to an outside lender. In this case the seller “holds the paper” requiring the taxpayer to pay the seller over time on specified terms. In general, it will also allow the seller to report the income from the periodic payments in the year in which they are received rather than all in the year of an outright sale.
    How does seller financing work?
    Seller financing can be structured in a couple of ways. One allows the buyer to receive title to the property at the time of closing and the other allows the buyer to take title upon payment of the last installment. More specifically, the first way would be documented with a promissory note from the buyer to the seller. This note would specify the interest rate, the length of time over which the loan was amortized, and the monthly payment amount. The note would typically be secured by a mortgage in favor of the seller as a lien against the property. In some jurisdictions the security interest used may be referred to as a trust deed or deed of trust.
    The second way of documenting the transaction would entail some kind of installment contract between the parties. Again, there are regional differences regarding the name of that contract. It can be called an Installment Agreement for Deed or a Contract for Deed or Articles of Agreement for Deed. For tax and exchange purposes they are all the same. Generally, there would be some money paid down from the buyer to the seller and the balance financed over time. Sometimes it will be paid off at the time of the last fixed payment and in other instances it has a balloon payment for the final lump sum.
    Whether the transaction is documented by a deed transfer at the time of the initial closing and secured by a note and mortgage or the deed passing upon final payment the tax treatment is the same. The buyer still owns the property either way, but subject to all payments being made. An analogy can be made to buying a new car with some dealer financing. In the case of an installment contract, the buyer owns the car but will not get clear title until it is paid off.
    Regardless of the structure, the documents should show the funds payable to the Qualified Intermediary. Funds paid to the taxpayer would constitute “boot” and therefore taxable.
    How does seller financing work with an exchange if the taxpayer is financing the buyer?
    This can be a bit tricky. For §1031 purposes, a taxpayer only has 180 days from the date of sale of the relinquished property to acquire the replacement property. For there to be total tax deferral, the full value of the sale property must be reinvested into the replacement property. But when seller financing is involved, the seller does not have the full value to roll over. There are times when the full value will be paid into the exchange account within the 180 day window but more often than not, it will be paid after the 180 day exchange period. So, payments coming into the exchange account can be used towards the acquisition of replacement property, but funds payable after that 180 day term cannot.
    Although there are various ways to deal with this, the most common one is for the seller to “advance” the balance due for the replacement property with personal funds. Those funds can come from the taxpayer directly or can be borrowed by the taxpayer. The exchange balance plus the additional funds are used to acquire the replacement property. The note and mortgage or the installment sale agreement is then assigned from the Qualified Intermediary to the taxpayer. Since the necessary value was invested on a timely basis into the replacement property, the receipt by the taxpayer of principal payments over time under the financing document are not taxable.
    How does seller financing work with an exchange if the taxpayer is receiving financing from the Seller?
    This situation is not as complicated as when the taxpayer is financing the buyer. In any exchange, in order to have complete deferral, a taxpayer has to reinvest all the net proceeds from the sale and have equal or greater new debt compared to debt paid off at the relinquished property closing. Debt in the form of the balance due under the seller financing structure counts just like conventional financing, so it would typically offset the debt requirement to have equal or greater debt on the replacement property.
    In summary, seller financing is a part of many real estate transactions. However, due to the rules around §1031 exchanges, some special steps need to be taken on account of the seller financing. If the taxpayer is selling, the loan must be documented so that the exchange company is the payee of the loan, and the applicable security interest should correspond. Once the loan document is monetized from a cash infusion by the taxpayer, the necessary amount can be exchanged into the replacement property. Ultimately, the security interest is assigned to the taxpayer and the taxpayer will not recognize any tax on the principal received over time due to the advancement of the funds at the time of the exchange. In the event the taxpayer is receiving the seller financing in connection with the purchase of the replacement property, such debt obligation is treated no differently than any other loan from a conventional financing source. The seller financing debt will offset debt paid off upon closing of the relinquished property.