Blog

  • Accruit Named Finalist in Illinois Real Estate Journals’ CRE Awards

    Accruit Named Finalist in Illinois Real Estate Journals’ CRE Awards

    Accruit has been named a finalist in the Professional Service Company category. 
    REjournals has announced the finalists for their 2024 Commercial Real Estate Awards. The REJournals CRE Awards celebrate the achievements, successes and highlights from all sectors of the commercial real estate industry. 
    Accruit, a national 1031 Exchange Qualified Intermediary and Exchange Accommodate Titleholder, boasts a considerable foothold in the greater Chicago, Illinois market with an office and two staff attorneys located in Chicago, Illinois.
    In 2023, Accruit supported over $15+ Billion in real estate transactions through our patented 1031 Exchange software, Exchange Manager Pro℠. Accruit alone as a Qualified Intermediary and Exchange Accommodation Titleholder facilitated $4.12 Billion in real estate transactions.
    Specific to Illinois, Accruit facilitated over $218 million in Relinquished Property transactions and over $122 million in Replacement Property transactions, totaling a combined $340+ million of RE closings in Illinois in 2023.
    In addition, Accruit presented two real estate continuing education courses for Illinois brokers and agents, as well as two continuing legal education courses to through collaborations with Advocus, formerly ATGF, and Illinois Real Estate Lawyers Association (IRELA). Accruit has participated as panelist speaker for four consecutive years, including 2023, at the RE Journals National Net Lease Summit in Chicago, IL.
    Accruit is active in providing 1031 Exchange education and resources to many Illinois associations including NICAR, IRELA, and Advocus.
    Lastly, in 2023, Accruit’s specialized services, as an Exchange Accommodation Titleholder, was part of the largest sale of a multi-tenant suburban office building in the past 18 months in Illinois, the Illinois CRE Awards and full list of finalists.

  • Accruit Named Finalist in Illinois Real Estate Journals’ CRE Awards

    Accruit Named Finalist in Illinois Real Estate Journals’ CRE Awards

    Accruit has been named a finalist in the Professional Service Company category. 
    REjournals has announced the finalists for their 2024 Commercial Real Estate Awards. The REJournals CRE Awards celebrate the achievements, successes and highlights from all sectors of the commercial real estate industry. 
    Accruit, a national 1031 Exchange Qualified Intermediary and Exchange Accommodate Titleholder, boasts a considerable foothold in the greater Chicago, Illinois market with an office and two staff attorneys located in Chicago, Illinois.
    In 2023, Accruit supported over $15+ Billion in real estate transactions through our patented 1031 Exchange software, Exchange Manager Pro℠. Accruit alone as a Qualified Intermediary and Exchange Accommodation Titleholder facilitated $4.12 Billion in real estate transactions.
    Specific to Illinois, Accruit facilitated over $218 million in Relinquished Property transactions and over $122 million in Replacement Property transactions, totaling a combined $340+ million of RE closings in Illinois in 2023.
    In addition, Accruit presented two real estate continuing education courses for Illinois brokers and agents, as well as two continuing legal education courses to through collaborations with Advocus, formerly ATGF, and Illinois Real Estate Lawyers Association (IRELA). Accruit has participated as panelist speaker for four consecutive years, including 2023, at the RE Journals National Net Lease Summit in Chicago, IL.
    Accruit is active in providing 1031 Exchange education and resources to many Illinois associations including NICAR, IRELA, and Advocus.
    Lastly, in 2023, Accruit’s specialized services, as an Exchange Accommodation Titleholder, was part of the largest sale of a multi-tenant suburban office building in the past 18 months in Illinois, the Illinois CRE Awards and full list of finalists.

  • Accruit Named Finalist in Illinois Real Estate Journals’ CRE Awards

    Accruit Named Finalist in Illinois Real Estate Journals’ CRE Awards

    Accruit has been named a finalist in the Professional Service Company category. 
    REjournals has announced the finalists for their 2024 Commercial Real Estate Awards. The REJournals CRE Awards celebrate the achievements, successes and highlights from all sectors of the commercial real estate industry. 
    Accruit, a national 1031 Exchange Qualified Intermediary and Exchange Accommodate Titleholder, boasts a considerable foothold in the greater Chicago, Illinois market with an office and two staff attorneys located in Chicago, Illinois.
    In 2023, Accruit supported over $15+ Billion in real estate transactions through our patented 1031 Exchange software, Exchange Manager Pro℠. Accruit alone as a Qualified Intermediary and Exchange Accommodation Titleholder facilitated $4.12 Billion in real estate transactions.
    Specific to Illinois, Accruit facilitated over $218 million in Relinquished Property transactions and over $122 million in Replacement Property transactions, totaling a combined $340+ million of RE closings in Illinois in 2023.
    In addition, Accruit presented two real estate continuing education courses for Illinois brokers and agents, as well as two continuing legal education courses to through collaborations with Advocus, formerly ATGF, and Illinois Real Estate Lawyers Association (IRELA). Accruit has participated as panelist speaker for four consecutive years, including 2023, at the RE Journals National Net Lease Summit in Chicago, IL.
    Accruit is active in providing 1031 Exchange education and resources to many Illinois associations including NICAR, IRELA, and Advocus.
    Lastly, in 2023, Accruit’s specialized services, as an Exchange Accommodation Titleholder, was part of the largest sale of a multi-tenant suburban office building in the past 18 months in Illinois, the Illinois CRE Awards and full list of finalists.

  • Do I Need a 1031 Exchange Qualified Intermediary Near Me?

    Do I Need a 1031 Exchange Qualified Intermediary Near Me?

    While local QIs offer proximity and knowledge of specific regulations, national QIs like Accruit provide broader expertise, resources, and risk management capabilities. National QIs understand regulations across the country, including state-specific mandates, such as those in Colorado and California.  
    Local QI vs. National QI 
    Generally, the most important aspect of picking a Qualified Intermediary to help an Exchanger carry out their 1031 Exchange is peace of mind, competency, and dependability. These attributes are not exclusive to local businesses, in fact they might be more commonly found with a national QI.  
    When considering a QI for a 1031 Exchange, the decision shouldn’t be based on proximity, but rather several other factors that have a greater impact on the exchange, including the following:

    Experience & Expertise 

    Local: Knowledgeable of specific local regulations & transactions, smaller volume of cases, limited expertise in complex transactions

    National: Knowledgeable of wide range of regulations & transactions across different states, larger volume of cases, greater expertise with complex transactions 

    Resources to Scale 

    Local: May be more limited on resources, work on a smaller scale with fewer cases, locally concentrated network

    National: Typically, robust resources and efficient handling of large volume of cases, wider network of professionals 

    Risk Mitigation 

    Local: Might not be able to offer the same level of risk mitigation 

    National: Likely to have strong insurance coverage and bonding in place, added safeguards for clients  

    While both types of QIs have their benefits, national QIs tend to offer wider expertise, resources, and risk management capabilities. However, the decision ultimately depends on individual needs, transactional complexity, and personal preferences.  
    State Regulations for QIs 
    When selecting a Qualified Intermediary, there are many options to choose from, some local and some national. While the idea of a local QI may seem attractive, a nationally recognized QI could provide the Exchanger with a better experience and more robust knowledge of the rules & regulations of IRC Section 1031, including the most recent court cases.  
    It’s important to remember there is no federal regulation of Qualified Intermediaries, however there are some state-level regulations in a handful of states that are meant to protect the Exchanger when facilitating an exchange with Relinquished Property within that state. We will focus on Colorado, Accruit’s headquarters, and California, a state with some of the most extensive requirements for Qualified Intermediaries.  
    Colorado 
    Requirements for Qualified Intermediaries conducting 1031 Exchanges vary from state-to-state. In 2009, Colorado’s legislature passed Senate Bill 1007, Chapter 708  which include: 

    Identical fidelity bond and Errors & Omissions (E&O) policy. 

    QIs must act as custodians and maintain strict management of client funds. 

    The California Franchise Tax Board mandates QIs to withhold 31/3% of the sales price for the Exchanger if the exchange fails. 

    For 1031 Exchanges involving out-of-state property, California enforces a “claw back”

  • Do I Need a 1031 Exchange Qualified Intermediary Near Me?

    Do I Need a 1031 Exchange Qualified Intermediary Near Me?

    While local QIs offer proximity and knowledge of specific regulations, national QIs like Accruit provide broader expertise, resources, and risk management capabilities. National QIs understand regulations across the country, including state-specific mandates, such as those in Colorado and California.  
    Local QI vs. National QI 
    Generally, the most important aspect of picking a Qualified Intermediary to help an Exchanger carry out their 1031 Exchange is peace of mind, competency, and dependability. These attributes are not exclusive to local businesses, in fact they might be more commonly found with a national QI.  
    When considering a QI for a 1031 Exchange, the decision shouldn’t be based on proximity, but rather several other factors that have a greater impact on the exchange, including the following:

    Experience & Expertise 

    Local: Knowledgeable of specific local regulations & transactions, smaller volume of cases, limited expertise in complex transactions

    National: Knowledgeable of wide range of regulations & transactions across different states, larger volume of cases, greater expertise with complex transactions 

    Resources to Scale 

    Local: May be more limited on resources, work on a smaller scale with fewer cases, locally concentrated network

    National: Typically, robust resources and efficient handling of large volume of cases, wider network of professionals 

    Risk Mitigation 

    Local: Might not be able to offer the same level of risk mitigation 

    National: Likely to have strong insurance coverage and bonding in place, added safeguards for clients  

    While both types of QIs have their benefits, national QIs tend to offer wider expertise, resources, and risk management capabilities. However, the decision ultimately depends on individual needs, transactional complexity, and personal preferences.  
    State Regulations for QIs 
    When selecting a Qualified Intermediary, there are many options to choose from, some local and some national. While the idea of a local QI may seem attractive, a nationally recognized QI could provide the Exchanger with a better experience and more robust knowledge of the rules & regulations of IRC Section 1031, including the most recent court cases.  
    It’s important to remember there is no federal regulation of Qualified Intermediaries, however there are some state-level regulations in a handful of states that are meant to protect the Exchanger when facilitating an exchange with Relinquished Property within that state. We will focus on Colorado, Accruit’s headquarters, and California, a state with some of the most extensive requirements for Qualified Intermediaries.  
    Colorado 
    Requirements for Qualified Intermediaries conducting 1031 Exchanges vary from state-to-state. In 2009, Colorado’s legislature passed Senate Bill 1007, Chapter 708  which include: 

    Identical fidelity bond and Errors & Omissions (E&O) policy. 

    QIs must act as custodians and maintain strict management of client funds. 

    The California Franchise Tax Board mandates QIs to withhold 31/3% of the sales price for the Exchanger if the exchange fails. 

    For 1031 Exchanges involving out-of-state property, California enforces a “claw back”

  • Do I Need a 1031 Exchange Qualified Intermediary Near Me?

    Do I Need a 1031 Exchange Qualified Intermediary Near Me?

    While local QIs offer proximity and knowledge of specific regulations, national QIs like Accruit provide broader expertise, resources, and risk management capabilities. National QIs understand regulations across the country, including state-specific mandates, such as those in Colorado and California.  
    Local QI vs. National QI 
    Generally, the most important aspect of picking a Qualified Intermediary to help an Exchanger carry out their 1031 Exchange is peace of mind, competency, and dependability. These attributes are not exclusive to local businesses, in fact they might be more commonly found with a national QI.  
    When considering a QI for a 1031 Exchange, the decision shouldn’t be based on proximity, but rather several other factors that have a greater impact on the exchange, including the following:

    Experience & Expertise 

    Local: Knowledgeable of specific local regulations & transactions, smaller volume of cases, limited expertise in complex transactions

    National: Knowledgeable of wide range of regulations & transactions across different states, larger volume of cases, greater expertise with complex transactions 

    Resources to Scale 

    Local: May be more limited on resources, work on a smaller scale with fewer cases, locally concentrated network

    National: Typically, robust resources and efficient handling of large volume of cases, wider network of professionals 

    Risk Mitigation 

    Local: Might not be able to offer the same level of risk mitigation 

    National: Likely to have strong insurance coverage and bonding in place, added safeguards for clients  

    While both types of QIs have their benefits, national QIs tend to offer wider expertise, resources, and risk management capabilities. However, the decision ultimately depends on individual needs, transactional complexity, and personal preferences.  
    State Regulations for QIs 
    When selecting a Qualified Intermediary, there are many options to choose from, some local and some national. While the idea of a local QI may seem attractive, a nationally recognized QI could provide the Exchanger with a better experience and more robust knowledge of the rules & regulations of IRC Section 1031, including the most recent court cases.  
    It’s important to remember there is no federal regulation of Qualified Intermediaries, however there are some state-level regulations in a handful of states that are meant to protect the Exchanger when facilitating an exchange with Relinquished Property within that state. We will focus on Colorado, Accruit’s headquarters, and California, a state with some of the most extensive requirements for Qualified Intermediaries.  
    Colorado 
    Requirements for Qualified Intermediaries conducting 1031 Exchanges vary from state-to-state. In 2009, Colorado’s legislature passed Senate Bill 1007, Chapter 708  which include: 

    Identical fidelity bond and Errors & Omissions (E&O) policy. 

    QIs must act as custodians and maintain strict management of client funds. 

    The California Franchise Tax Board mandates QIs to withhold 31/3% of the sales price for the Exchanger if the exchange fails. 

    For 1031 Exchanges involving out-of-state property, California enforces a “claw back”

  • The Rise of Build-to-Rent Homes: A Lucrative Investment and Housing Solution

    The Rise of Build-to-Rent Homes: A Lucrative Investment and Housing Solution

    In recent years, the real estate landscape has witnessed a notable shift in housing preferences and investment strategies. One trend that has gained significant traction is the concept of build-to-rent homes. This model involves the construction of residential properties specifically intended for rental purposes, rather than for sale to individual homeowners.  
    What is a Build-to-Rent Home?  
    Build-to-rent homes, often abbreviated as BTR, are purpose-built residential properties designed and constructed with the intention of being rented out to tenants rather than sold as individual units. Unlike traditional rental properties, which may consist of converted apartments or single-family homes once owned by a homeowner, build-to-rent developments are planned from the ground up to cater to the needs and preferences of today’s renters. 
    These properties typically offer a range of amenities and communal facilities, such as fitness centers, swimming pools, coworking spaces, and communal gardens, aimed at enhancing the living experience for tenants. Additionally, build-to-rent communities often feature professional property management services to ensure tenants’ needs are promptly addressed and the properties are well-maintained. 
    Why Investors are Flocking to Build-to-Rent Homes 
    For decades the approach for investors in the Single-Family Rental space was to purchase existing homes at a low price, make minimal improvements before renting the home out for a handful of years, after which time the home is ultimately sold. Today’s real estate market is proving that strategy to be very difficult, if not impossible. Due to a national housing shortage and high interest rates, the option for investors to buy existing single-family homes for a profitable investment are scarce. Therefore, many Single-Family Rental (SFR) investors are turning their sights and finite resources to Build-to-Rent homes.  
    The growing popularity of build-to-rent homes among investors can be attributed to several key factors: 
    Stability and Predictable Income Streams: Build-to-rent properties offer investors a reliable and steady stream of rental income, providing greater stability compared to other forms of real estate investment, such as flipping or speculative development. With long-term leases and a built-in demand for rental housing, investors can enjoy consistent cash flows and mitigate the risks associated with vacancy and market fluctuations. 
    According to a report by Real Capital Analytics, investment in build-to-rent properties surged to a record high of $7.4 billion in the first half of 2023, representing a 43% increase compared to the same period the previous year. 
    Favorable Market Dynamics: Changing demographics, evolving lifestyle preferences, and affordability constraints have fueled the demand for rental housing across various demographic segments, including millennials, young professionals, and empty nesters. Millennials are reaching a stage in life where they want a single-family home, but due to a lack of savings, high home prices and high interest rates, the desire for homeownership isn’t a reality – so they are turning to single-family rentals. As a result, build-to-rent developments are well-positioned to capitalize on this growing demand and achieve high occupancy rates. 
    Data from the U.S. Census Bureau reveals that the homeownership rate in the United States declined to 64.5% in 2023, down from a peak of 69.2% in 2004, indicating a shift towards rental living. 
    Scalability and Portfolio Diversification: Build-to-rent investments offer investors the opportunity to scale their portfolios efficiently by acquiring multiple properties within a single development or across different locations. The many aspects of property management are made easier if the properties are in proximity to others being rented out.  By diversifying their holdings across various markets, investors can spread risk and optimize their returns, particularly in markets with strong rental demand and favorable economic fundamentals. 
    A study conducted by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) found that 72% of institutional investors surveyed viewed build-to-rent as a core or strategic part of their real estate portfolios, highlighting the sector’s appeal for institutional capital deployment. 
    Why Individuals are Embracing Build-to-Rent Living 
    The appeal of build-to-rent homes extends beyond investors to tenants seeking flexible and hassle-free housing solutions. Several factors contribute to the growing interest in build-to-rent living among individuals: 
    Flexibility and Lifestyle Benefits: Build-to-rent communities offer tenants greater flexibility and freedom compared to traditional homeownership. With shorter lease terms and the option to renew or relocate easily, renters can adapt to changing life circumstances without being tied down by mortgage obligations or property maintenance responsibilities. Tenants interested in getting a feel for a particular community before putting down roots through a purchase of a home can accomplish this without the significant commitment.  Others may not be able to afford a home in a certain area but feel the quality of the local school district is worth living in the particular BTR community. 
    Research conducted by the National Multifamily Housing Council (NMHC) found that 79% of renters considered flexibility and the ability to relocate for job opportunities as important factors influencing their housing decisions. 
    Access to High-Quality Amenities and Services: Build-to-rent developments prioritize the provision of premium amenities and services aimed at enhancing the quality of life for residents. From state-of-the-art fitness centers and resort-style pools to pet-friendly facilities and on-site concierge services, tenants can enjoy a resort-like living experience without the burden of homeownership. 
    A survey conducted by Multifamily Executive magazine revealed that 67% of renters were willing to pay higher rents for access to desirable amenities and conveniences within build-to-rent communities. 
    Affordability and Cost-Efficiency: In many markets, renting a build-to-rent home can offer cost advantages compared to purchasing a comparable property. With rising home prices and tightening mortgage lending standards, many individuals, particularly younger generations, find homeownership financially out of reach. Renting allows them to enjoy the benefits of homeownership, such as modern amenities and community living, at a fraction of the cost. 
    Data from the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University indicates that the median renter household spent 20.7% of their income on housing in 2023, compared to 33.1% for homeowner households, highlighting the affordability advantage of renting for many households. 
    Can Investors utilize a 1031 Exchange on Build-to-Rent Properties? 
    This large strategy shift in Single Family Rental sector, brings up an interesting question – Are BTR homes eligible for a 1031 Exchange? The answer is dependent on the fact pattern of each specific situation, but there are some general considerations.   
    BTR Property as Relinquished Property  
    Under Section 1031, an Exchanger must have acquired the subject property with the intent to use as an investment or for use in a business or trade.  It seems clear that Build-to-Rent properties as Relinquished Property are assets used in connection with the BTR company’s primary business, so this important threshold is met.   
    BTR Property as Replacement Property  
    In general, an investor can utilize a Build-to-Suit (BTS) 1031 Exchange to dispose of existing real estate properties and acquire new land and construct their Replacement Property, in this case Build-to-Rent properties, upon the land with their Exchange Funds.  However, this cannot be done in a straightforward manner, rather the transaction must be facilitated using a third-party accommodator. 
    The issue presented when an Exchange wants to use the value of improvements to property as part of the Replacement Property value, is that without anything more, using proceeds to pay for labor and material is not equivalent to using funds to acquire like-kind property.  Due to this distinction, in in the year 2000, the IRS came out with Rev. Proc. 2000-37 to provide a “safe harbor” structure to accomplish the end goal of allowing the improvement value to be counted as part of the overall 1031 Exchange. 
    In a nutshell, the Exchanger retains the services of a an “Exchange Accommodation Titleholder” or (“EAT”), which is typically also a Qualified Intermediary, who takes title to the Replacement Property(ies), in a BTS exchange it is the raw land.  The EAT will acquire the property via a new LLC under which it is the single member.  While in title, the desired improvements are made as directed and supervised by the Exchanger.  Once the improvements are done, or earlier depending upon applicable exchange rule deadlines, ownership of the property is handed over to the Exchanger directly.  With this legal sleight of hand, the Exchanger is deemed to have acquired real estate as improved rather than simply real estate plus the value of labor and materials, the latter of which would not otherwise be eligible for a 1031 Exchange. 
    BTR Property as Replacement Property with Land Owned by Related Entity 
    In situations where the Exchanger is acquiring the new land from a third party, the transaction can take place as described above.  However, at times the target land is held by a party deemed “related” to the taxpayer entity, i.e. held by an affiliate.  In this case, it makes the structure of a BTS Exchange property somewhat more complicated. 
    Under certain IRS Related Party rules, an Exchanger cannot acquire land that is owned by the Related Party.  So, without more, should the EAT in the process described above acquire the property from an Exchanger Related Party and then transfer it to the Exchanger, it would not pass muster.  However, there are a series of IRS Private Letter Rulings that provide a possible way around the Related Party impediment. 
    This technique entails having the EAT lease the property from the Related Party under a long-term lease.  The EAT then makes the improvements, in this case builds the homes, and as a legal matter, the improvements are owned by the EAT as lessee and not part of the underlying (fee) land ownership.  The homes are ultimately transferred to the Exchanger as Replacement Property via an assignment of the membership interest in the lease.  The acquisition does not run afoul of the Related Party rules since the property improvements are received entirely from the EAT and in no respect from the Related Party. 
    BTR Property as Replacement Property with Land Owned by the Taxpayer 
    In the event the target land is owned directly by the Exchanger, the structuring is even made more difficult since a Related Party does not exist with which to enter into the lease arrangement to separate the parties.  In this instance, it might be possible to change the ownership of the Replacement Property from the Exchanger to a Related Party to the Exchanger.  Once that is done, then the Leasehold Improvement Exchange as described above can be structured.   
    It is important to note that the IRS does not allow the Related Party issue to be skirted as easily as simply changing the ownership to that of an affiliate.  Pursuant to IRS Rev. Proc. 2004-51, in order to recognize such a change of ownership, a period of more than 180 days must elapse before the Exchanger is not deemed to own the Replacement Property.  Any such change to the ownership of the Replacement Property, at the minimum, would require a passage of 180 days before an improvement process could be put into place.  It would be helpful as well for there to be independent business reasons supporting the change in ownership.  
     
    In conclusion, Build-to-rent homes represent a compelling investment opportunity for real estate investors seeking stable income streams, portfolio diversification, and exposure to the growing demand for rental housing. Similarly, individuals are increasingly turning to build-to-rent living as a flexible, convenient, and cost-effective housing solution that aligns with their lifestyle preferences and financial realities. 
    For real estate investors looking to enter the BTR sector, 1031 Exchanges, specifically Build-to-Suit possibly utilizing leasehold improvement structures, can be utilized to defer capital gains, depreciation recapture, state, and net investment income tax. Depending on the owner of the land in which the properties will be constructed, additional planning and due diligence may be required in order to be in accordance with 1031 Exchange rules and regulations.  
     
     
    The material in this blog is presented for informational purposes only. The information presented is not investment, legal, tax or compliance advice. Accruit performs the duties of a Qualified Intermediary, and as such does not offer or sell investments or provide investment, legal, or tax advice.   
     

  • The Rise of Build-to-Rent Homes: A Lucrative Investment and Housing Solution

    The Rise of Build-to-Rent Homes: A Lucrative Investment and Housing Solution

    In recent years, the real estate landscape has witnessed a notable shift in housing preferences and investment strategies. One trend that has gained significant traction is the concept of build-to-rent homes. This model involves the construction of residential properties specifically intended for rental purposes, rather than for sale to individual homeowners.  
    What is a Build-to-Rent Home?  
    Build-to-rent homes, often abbreviated as BTR, are purpose-built residential properties designed and constructed with the intention of being rented out to tenants rather than sold as individual units. Unlike traditional rental properties, which may consist of converted apartments or single-family homes once owned by a homeowner, build-to-rent developments are planned from the ground up to cater to the needs and preferences of today’s renters. 
    These properties typically offer a range of amenities and communal facilities, such as fitness centers, swimming pools, coworking spaces, and communal gardens, aimed at enhancing the living experience for tenants. Additionally, build-to-rent communities often feature professional property management services to ensure tenants’ needs are promptly addressed and the properties are well-maintained. 
    Why Investors are Flocking to Build-to-Rent Homes 
    For decades the approach for investors in the Single-Family Rental space was to purchase existing homes at a low price, make minimal improvements before renting the home out for a handful of years, after which time the home is ultimately sold. Today’s real estate market is proving that strategy to be very difficult, if not impossible. Due to a national housing shortage and high interest rates, the option for investors to buy existing single-family homes for a profitable investment are scarce. Therefore, many Single-Family Rental (SFR) investors are turning their sights and finite resources to Build-to-Rent homes.  
    The growing popularity of build-to-rent homes among investors can be attributed to several key factors: 
    Stability and Predictable Income Streams: Build-to-rent properties offer investors a reliable and steady stream of rental income, providing greater stability compared to other forms of real estate investment, such as flipping or speculative development. With long-term leases and a built-in demand for rental housing, investors can enjoy consistent cash flows and mitigate the risks associated with vacancy and market fluctuations. 
    According to a report by Real Capital Analytics, investment in build-to-rent properties surged to a record high of $7.4 billion in the first half of 2023, representing a 43% increase compared to the same period the previous year. 
    Favorable Market Dynamics: Changing demographics, evolving lifestyle preferences, and affordability constraints have fueled the demand for rental housing across various demographic segments, including millennials, young professionals, and empty nesters. Millennials are reaching a stage in life where they want a single-family home, but due to a lack of savings, high home prices and high interest rates, the desire for homeownership isn’t a reality – so they are turning to single-family rentals. As a result, build-to-rent developments are well-positioned to capitalize on this growing demand and achieve high occupancy rates. 
    Data from the U.S. Census Bureau reveals that the homeownership rate in the United States declined to 64.5% in 2023, down from a peak of 69.2% in 2004, indicating a shift towards rental living. 
    Scalability and Portfolio Diversification: Build-to-rent investments offer investors the opportunity to scale their portfolios efficiently by acquiring multiple properties within a single development or across different locations. The many aspects of property management are made easier if the properties are in proximity to others being rented out.  By diversifying their holdings across various markets, investors can spread risk and optimize their returns, particularly in markets with strong rental demand and favorable economic fundamentals. 
    A study conducted by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) found that 72% of institutional investors surveyed viewed build-to-rent as a core or strategic part of their real estate portfolios, highlighting the sector’s appeal for institutional capital deployment. 
    Why Individuals are Embracing Build-to-Rent Living 
    The appeal of build-to-rent homes extends beyond investors to tenants seeking flexible and hassle-free housing solutions. Several factors contribute to the growing interest in build-to-rent living among individuals: 
    Flexibility and Lifestyle Benefits: Build-to-rent communities offer tenants greater flexibility and freedom compared to traditional homeownership. With shorter lease terms and the option to renew or relocate easily, renters can adapt to changing life circumstances without being tied down by mortgage obligations or property maintenance responsibilities. Tenants interested in getting a feel for a particular community before putting down roots through a purchase of a home can accomplish this without the significant commitment.  Others may not be able to afford a home in a certain area but feel the quality of the local school district is worth living in the particular BTR community. 
    Research conducted by the National Multifamily Housing Council (NMHC) found that 79% of renters considered flexibility and the ability to relocate for job opportunities as important factors influencing their housing decisions. 
    Access to High-Quality Amenities and Services: Build-to-rent developments prioritize the provision of premium amenities and services aimed at enhancing the quality of life for residents. From state-of-the-art fitness centers and resort-style pools to pet-friendly facilities and on-site concierge services, tenants can enjoy a resort-like living experience without the burden of homeownership. 
    A survey conducted by Multifamily Executive magazine revealed that 67% of renters were willing to pay higher rents for access to desirable amenities and conveniences within build-to-rent communities. 
    Affordability and Cost-Efficiency: In many markets, renting a build-to-rent home can offer cost advantages compared to purchasing a comparable property. With rising home prices and tightening mortgage lending standards, many individuals, particularly younger generations, find homeownership financially out of reach. Renting allows them to enjoy the benefits of homeownership, such as modern amenities and community living, at a fraction of the cost. 
    Data from the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University indicates that the median renter household spent 20.7% of their income on housing in 2023, compared to 33.1% for homeowner households, highlighting the affordability advantage of renting for many households. 
    Can Investors utilize a 1031 Exchange on Build-to-Rent Properties? 
    This large strategy shift in Single Family Rental sector, brings up an interesting question – Are BTR homes eligible for a 1031 Exchange? The answer is dependent on the fact pattern of each specific situation, but there are some general considerations.   
    BTR Property as Relinquished Property  
    Under Section 1031, an Exchanger must have acquired the subject property with the intent to use as an investment or for use in a business or trade.  It seems clear that Build-to-Rent properties as Relinquished Property are assets used in connection with the BTR company’s primary business, so this important threshold is met.   
    BTR Property as Replacement Property  
    In general, an investor can utilize a Build-to-Suit (BTS) 1031 Exchange to dispose of existing real estate properties and acquire new land and construct their Replacement Property, in this case Build-to-Rent properties, upon the land with their Exchange Funds.  However, this cannot be done in a straightforward manner, rather the transaction must be facilitated using a third-party accommodator. 
    The issue presented when an Exchange wants to use the value of improvements to property as part of the Replacement Property value, is that without anything more, using proceeds to pay for labor and material is not equivalent to using funds to acquire like-kind property.  Due to this distinction, in in the year 2000, the IRS came out with Rev. Proc. 2000-37 to provide a “safe harbor” structure to accomplish the end goal of allowing the improvement value to be counted as part of the overall 1031 Exchange. 
    In a nutshell, the Exchanger retains the services of a an “Exchange Accommodation Titleholder” or (“EAT”), which is typically also a Qualified Intermediary, who takes title to the Replacement Property(ies), in a BTS exchange it is the raw land.  The EAT will acquire the property via a new LLC under which it is the single member.  While in title, the desired improvements are made as directed and supervised by the Exchanger.  Once the improvements are done, or earlier depending upon applicable exchange rule deadlines, ownership of the property is handed over to the Exchanger directly.  With this legal sleight of hand, the Exchanger is deemed to have acquired real estate as improved rather than simply real estate plus the value of labor and materials, the latter of which would not otherwise be eligible for a 1031 Exchange. 
    BTR Property as Replacement Property with Land Owned by Related Entity 
    In situations where the Exchanger is acquiring the new land from a third party, the transaction can take place as described above.  However, at times the target land is held by a party deemed “related” to the taxpayer entity, i.e. held by an affiliate.  In this case, it makes the structure of a BTS Exchange property somewhat more complicated. 
    Under certain IRS Related Party rules, an Exchanger cannot acquire land that is owned by the Related Party.  So, without more, should the EAT in the process described above acquire the property from an Exchanger Related Party and then transfer it to the Exchanger, it would not pass muster.  However, there are a series of IRS Private Letter Rulings that provide a possible way around the Related Party impediment. 
    This technique entails having the EAT lease the property from the Related Party under a long-term lease.  The EAT then makes the improvements, in this case builds the homes, and as a legal matter, the improvements are owned by the EAT as lessee and not part of the underlying (fee) land ownership.  The homes are ultimately transferred to the Exchanger as Replacement Property via an assignment of the membership interest in the lease.  The acquisition does not run afoul of the Related Party rules since the property improvements are received entirely from the EAT and in no respect from the Related Party. 
    BTR Property as Replacement Property with Land Owned by the Taxpayer 
    In the event the target land is owned directly by the Exchanger, the structuring is even made more difficult since a Related Party does not exist with which to enter into the lease arrangement to separate the parties.  In this instance, it might be possible to change the ownership of the Replacement Property from the Exchanger to a Related Party to the Exchanger.  Once that is done, then the Leasehold Improvement Exchange as described above can be structured.   
    It is important to note that the IRS does not allow the Related Party issue to be skirted as easily as simply changing the ownership to that of an affiliate.  Pursuant to IRS Rev. Proc. 2004-51, in order to recognize such a change of ownership, a period of more than 180 days must elapse before the Exchanger is not deemed to own the Replacement Property.  Any such change to the ownership of the Replacement Property, at the minimum, would require a passage of 180 days before an improvement process could be put into place.  It would be helpful as well for there to be independent business reasons supporting the change in ownership.  
     
    In conclusion, Build-to-rent homes represent a compelling investment opportunity for real estate investors seeking stable income streams, portfolio diversification, and exposure to the growing demand for rental housing. Similarly, individuals are increasingly turning to build-to-rent living as a flexible, convenient, and cost-effective housing solution that aligns with their lifestyle preferences and financial realities. 
    For real estate investors looking to enter the BTR sector, 1031 Exchanges, specifically Build-to-Suit possibly utilizing leasehold improvement structures, can be utilized to defer capital gains, depreciation recapture, state, and net investment income tax. Depending on the owner of the land in which the properties will be constructed, additional planning and due diligence may be required in order to be in accordance with 1031 Exchange rules and regulations.  
     
     
    The material in this blog is presented for informational purposes only. The information presented is not investment, legal, tax or compliance advice. Accruit performs the duties of a Qualified Intermediary, and as such does not offer or sell investments or provide investment, legal, or tax advice.   
     

  • The Rise of Build-to-Rent Homes: A Lucrative Investment and Housing Solution

    The Rise of Build-to-Rent Homes: A Lucrative Investment and Housing Solution

    In recent years, the real estate landscape has witnessed a notable shift in housing preferences and investment strategies. One trend that has gained significant traction is the concept of build-to-rent homes. This model involves the construction of residential properties specifically intended for rental purposes, rather than for sale to individual homeowners.  
    What is a Build-to-Rent Home?  
    Build-to-rent homes, often abbreviated as BTR, are purpose-built residential properties designed and constructed with the intention of being rented out to tenants rather than sold as individual units. Unlike traditional rental properties, which may consist of converted apartments or single-family homes once owned by a homeowner, build-to-rent developments are planned from the ground up to cater to the needs and preferences of today’s renters. 
    These properties typically offer a range of amenities and communal facilities, such as fitness centers, swimming pools, coworking spaces, and communal gardens, aimed at enhancing the living experience for tenants. Additionally, build-to-rent communities often feature professional property management services to ensure tenants’ needs are promptly addressed and the properties are well-maintained. 
    Why Investors are Flocking to Build-to-Rent Homes 
    For decades the approach for investors in the Single-Family Rental space was to purchase existing homes at a low price, make minimal improvements before renting the home out for a handful of years, after which time the home is ultimately sold. Today’s real estate market is proving that strategy to be very difficult, if not impossible. Due to a national housing shortage and high interest rates, the option for investors to buy existing single-family homes for a profitable investment are scarce. Therefore, many Single-Family Rental (SFR) investors are turning their sights and finite resources to Build-to-Rent homes.  
    The growing popularity of build-to-rent homes among investors can be attributed to several key factors: 
    Stability and Predictable Income Streams: Build-to-rent properties offer investors a reliable and steady stream of rental income, providing greater stability compared to other forms of real estate investment, such as flipping or speculative development. With long-term leases and a built-in demand for rental housing, investors can enjoy consistent cash flows and mitigate the risks associated with vacancy and market fluctuations. 
    According to a report by Real Capital Analytics, investment in build-to-rent properties surged to a record high of $7.4 billion in the first half of 2023, representing a 43% increase compared to the same period the previous year. 
    Favorable Market Dynamics: Changing demographics, evolving lifestyle preferences, and affordability constraints have fueled the demand for rental housing across various demographic segments, including millennials, young professionals, and empty nesters. Millennials are reaching a stage in life where they want a single-family home, but due to a lack of savings, high home prices and high interest rates, the desire for homeownership isn’t a reality – so they are turning to single-family rentals. As a result, build-to-rent developments are well-positioned to capitalize on this growing demand and achieve high occupancy rates. 
    Data from the U.S. Census Bureau reveals that the homeownership rate in the United States declined to 64.5% in 2023, down from a peak of 69.2% in 2004, indicating a shift towards rental living. 
    Scalability and Portfolio Diversification: Build-to-rent investments offer investors the opportunity to scale their portfolios efficiently by acquiring multiple properties within a single development or across different locations. The many aspects of property management are made easier if the properties are in proximity to others being rented out.  By diversifying their holdings across various markets, investors can spread risk and optimize their returns, particularly in markets with strong rental demand and favorable economic fundamentals. 
    A study conducted by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) found that 72% of institutional investors surveyed viewed build-to-rent as a core or strategic part of their real estate portfolios, highlighting the sector’s appeal for institutional capital deployment. 
    Why Individuals are Embracing Build-to-Rent Living 
    The appeal of build-to-rent homes extends beyond investors to tenants seeking flexible and hassle-free housing solutions. Several factors contribute to the growing interest in build-to-rent living among individuals: 
    Flexibility and Lifestyle Benefits: Build-to-rent communities offer tenants greater flexibility and freedom compared to traditional homeownership. With shorter lease terms and the option to renew or relocate easily, renters can adapt to changing life circumstances without being tied down by mortgage obligations or property maintenance responsibilities. Tenants interested in getting a feel for a particular community before putting down roots through a purchase of a home can accomplish this without the significant commitment.  Others may not be able to afford a home in a certain area but feel the quality of the local school district is worth living in the particular BTR community. 
    Research conducted by the National Multifamily Housing Council (NMHC) found that 79% of renters considered flexibility and the ability to relocate for job opportunities as important factors influencing their housing decisions. 
    Access to High-Quality Amenities and Services: Build-to-rent developments prioritize the provision of premium amenities and services aimed at enhancing the quality of life for residents. From state-of-the-art fitness centers and resort-style pools to pet-friendly facilities and on-site concierge services, tenants can enjoy a resort-like living experience without the burden of homeownership. 
    A survey conducted by Multifamily Executive magazine revealed that 67% of renters were willing to pay higher rents for access to desirable amenities and conveniences within build-to-rent communities. 
    Affordability and Cost-Efficiency: In many markets, renting a build-to-rent home can offer cost advantages compared to purchasing a comparable property. With rising home prices and tightening mortgage lending standards, many individuals, particularly younger generations, find homeownership financially out of reach. Renting allows them to enjoy the benefits of homeownership, such as modern amenities and community living, at a fraction of the cost. 
    Data from the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University indicates that the median renter household spent 20.7% of their income on housing in 2023, compared to 33.1% for homeowner households, highlighting the affordability advantage of renting for many households. 
    Can Investors utilize a 1031 Exchange on Build-to-Rent Properties? 
    This large strategy shift in Single Family Rental sector, brings up an interesting question – Are BTR homes eligible for a 1031 Exchange? The answer is dependent on the fact pattern of each specific situation, but there are some general considerations.   
    BTR Property as Relinquished Property  
    Under Section 1031, an Exchanger must have acquired the subject property with the intent to use as an investment or for use in a business or trade.  It seems clear that Build-to-Rent properties as Relinquished Property are assets used in connection with the BTR company’s primary business, so this important threshold is met.   
    BTR Property as Replacement Property  
    In general, an investor can utilize a Build-to-Suit (BTS) 1031 Exchange to dispose of existing real estate properties and acquire new land and construct their Replacement Property, in this case Build-to-Rent properties, upon the land with their Exchange Funds.  However, this cannot be done in a straightforward manner, rather the transaction must be facilitated using a third-party accommodator. 
    The issue presented when an Exchange wants to use the value of improvements to property as part of the Replacement Property value, is that without anything more, using proceeds to pay for labor and material is not equivalent to using funds to acquire like-kind property.  Due to this distinction, in in the year 2000, the IRS came out with Rev. Proc. 2000-37 to provide a “safe harbor” structure to accomplish the end goal of allowing the improvement value to be counted as part of the overall 1031 Exchange. 
    In a nutshell, the Exchanger retains the services of a an “Exchange Accommodation Titleholder” or (“EAT”), which is typically also a Qualified Intermediary, who takes title to the Replacement Property(ies), in a BTS exchange it is the raw land.  The EAT will acquire the property via a new LLC under which it is the single member.  While in title, the desired improvements are made as directed and supervised by the Exchanger.  Once the improvements are done, or earlier depending upon applicable exchange rule deadlines, ownership of the property is handed over to the Exchanger directly.  With this legal sleight of hand, the Exchanger is deemed to have acquired real estate as improved rather than simply real estate plus the value of labor and materials, the latter of which would not otherwise be eligible for a 1031 Exchange. 
    BTR Property as Replacement Property with Land Owned by Related Entity 
    In situations where the Exchanger is acquiring the new land from a third party, the transaction can take place as described above.  However, at times the target land is held by a party deemed “related” to the taxpayer entity, i.e. held by an affiliate.  In this case, it makes the structure of a BTS Exchange property somewhat more complicated. 
    Under certain IRS Related Party rules, an Exchanger cannot acquire land that is owned by the Related Party.  So, without more, should the EAT in the process described above acquire the property from an Exchanger Related Party and then transfer it to the Exchanger, it would not pass muster.  However, there are a series of IRS Private Letter Rulings that provide a possible way around the Related Party impediment. 
    This technique entails having the EAT lease the property from the Related Party under a long-term lease.  The EAT then makes the improvements, in this case builds the homes, and as a legal matter, the improvements are owned by the EAT as lessee and not part of the underlying (fee) land ownership.  The homes are ultimately transferred to the Exchanger as Replacement Property via an assignment of the membership interest in the lease.  The acquisition does not run afoul of the Related Party rules since the property improvements are received entirely from the EAT and in no respect from the Related Party. 
    BTR Property as Replacement Property with Land Owned by the Taxpayer 
    In the event the target land is owned directly by the Exchanger, the structuring is even made more difficult since a Related Party does not exist with which to enter into the lease arrangement to separate the parties.  In this instance, it might be possible to change the ownership of the Replacement Property from the Exchanger to a Related Party to the Exchanger.  Once that is done, then the Leasehold Improvement Exchange as described above can be structured.   
    It is important to note that the IRS does not allow the Related Party issue to be skirted as easily as simply changing the ownership to that of an affiliate.  Pursuant to IRS Rev. Proc. 2004-51, in order to recognize such a change of ownership, a period of more than 180 days must elapse before the Exchanger is not deemed to own the Replacement Property.  Any such change to the ownership of the Replacement Property, at the minimum, would require a passage of 180 days before an improvement process could be put into place.  It would be helpful as well for there to be independent business reasons supporting the change in ownership.  
     
    In conclusion, Build-to-rent homes represent a compelling investment opportunity for real estate investors seeking stable income streams, portfolio diversification, and exposure to the growing demand for rental housing. Similarly, individuals are increasingly turning to build-to-rent living as a flexible, convenient, and cost-effective housing solution that aligns with their lifestyle preferences and financial realities. 
    For real estate investors looking to enter the BTR sector, 1031 Exchanges, specifically Build-to-Suit possibly utilizing leasehold improvement structures, can be utilized to defer capital gains, depreciation recapture, state, and net investment income tax. Depending on the owner of the land in which the properties will be constructed, additional planning and due diligence may be required in order to be in accordance with 1031 Exchange rules and regulations.  
     
     
    The material in this blog is presented for informational purposes only. The information presented is not investment, legal, tax or compliance advice. Accruit performs the duties of a Qualified Intermediary, and as such does not offer or sell investments or provide investment, legal, or tax advice.   
     

  • Can A Simultaneous 1031 Exchange be Done Without the Use of a Qualified Intermediary?

    Can A Simultaneous 1031 Exchange be Done Without the Use of a Qualified Intermediary?

    Simultaneous Exchange versus Delayed Exchange 
    Most 1031 Exchanges take place on a delayed basis.  That is to say that the Exchanger sells his Relinquished Property to a buyer of choice and acquires Replacement Property from a seller of choice within 180 days thereafter, or by the due date for filing the tax return for the year of the sale, hence a delay in completed the exchange.  However, on occasion, there are just two or three parties who wish to directly exchange properties.  Because circumstances exist, they are able to exchange properties simultaneously, i.e. at the same exact time, rather than on a delayed basis.   
    Facing the circumstances of a simultaneous exchange, including the absence of the requirement of holding funds until the close of a transaction to complete the exchange present in a delayed exchange, the parties sometimes consider entering into a 1031 Exchange transaction without involving a Qualified Intermediary. While this can be done, as the use of a  
    Qualified Intermediary is not a precondition to a valid 1031 Exchange transaction, there are reasons why an Exchanger might want to use the same structure for a simultaneous 1031 Exchange that is customarily used for a delayed 1031 Exchange. 
    A simultaneous exchange may seem as simple as two parties exchanging deeds to their properties of the same fair market value to complete a valid 1031 Exchange or one party paying in cash to equalize the values. However, there is more to it, much of which being proper processes and documentation are often overlooked. Should an audit occur, the documentation will be relied upon to determine if the 1031 Exchange stands up to IRS scrutiny.  
    Criteria for a Valid 1031 Exchange 
    As mentioned above, there are certain requirements that must be met for a valid 1031 Exchange in addition to merely exchanging properties via title transfer and possibly cash from one party to make up for a difference in fair market value.  
    Intent to Exchange 
    For a 1031 Exchange to be valid, there has to be an expressed intent to exchange requiring the purchase and sale of the properties to be reciprocal and mutually interdependent. The typical tax deferred exchange agreement contains language covering this requirement. Without more, a standard form Purchase and Sale Agreement would not contain necessary language to this effect. The presence of an “exchange cooperation clause” in a form contract would not suffice for this purpose. 
    Exchange Requirement  
    One of the primary drivers of the 1991 exchange regulations was to provide a way to maintain an “exchange event” between the parties while effectively taking the Exchanger’s buyer and seller out of the active participation in the Exchanger’s 1031 Exchange transaction. This was accomplished through the use of a new player, the “Qualified Intermediary” (QI). The idea was that the QI could substitute for the Exchanger’s buyer and seller as the party with whom the Exchanger was exchanging the properties, i.e. an intermediary in the middle of the transaction. The buyer and seller could be just that, they did not have to actively participate in the exchange. However, a simultaneous exchange without the use of a QI requires those other parties to be involved in the exchange and that is not always something they are willing to undertake. The buyer would have to agree to obtain the property from the Seller in lieu of paying the Exchanger and to transfer that property to the Exchanger. Likewise, the Seller would have to agree to sell the property to the buyer in lieu of the Exchanger. Contracts between the parties would have to be consistent with this. Proper conveyances would need to be made, reps and warranties might have to run to parties other than the person to whom the property was being transferred to or from, etc. Certain jurisdictions may seek to impose transfer taxes on some of the conveyances. 
    Actual or Constructive Receipt of Funds 
    Further, an Exchanger cannot be in actual or constructive receipt of any sale proceeds during the pendency of a 1031Exchange. When using a QI, including its secondary role of holding the exchange proceeds, even for a transitory moment, the regulations provide that with proper language in the exchange agreement and/or an accompanying “qualified escrow” agreement, the Exchanger will not be deemed to be in actual or constructive receipt. Conversely, with a simultaneous exchange using a routine closing escrow, that document may not have the type of language which insures against actual or constructive receipt. 
    Inexpensive Insurance 
    It is often said that a person’s purchase of their home might be the most significant purchase they make during their lifetime. Purchasing an investment or business use property is also a very significant event and so is the certainty of receiving tax deferral via a successful 1031 Exchange.  
    A buyer of a new home would not consider buying such an important property without the protection of title insurance. The 1031 Exchange regulations provide a “safe harbor” structure for the exchange of properties. The use of a Qualified Intermediary, such as Accruit, assures for a 1031 Exchange within the safe harbor to be preapproved by the IRS, which is equivalent to receiving title insurance. Think of it as Exchange Insurance. The cost of a 1031 Exchange is generally a minor amount, especially when considering the tax deferral at stake, so it is often considered a worthwhile expense to assure the transaction meets with the IRS requirements. 
    The drafters of the regulations understood while it is possible to do an exchange without using a Qualified Intermediary, Exchangers might like to take advantage of the safe harbor and the assurance it provides. So, they addressed this issue in the Preamble to the 1991 Regulations: 
    Extension of safe harbor rules to simultaneous exchanges  
    The rules in the proposed regulations, including the safe harbors, apply only to deferred exchanges. Commentators noted that the concerns relating to actual or constructive receipt and agency also exist in the case of simultaneous exchanges. They requested that the safe harbors be made available for simultaneous exchanges. Upon review, the Service has determined it necessary to make only the qualified intermediary safe harbor available for simultaneous exchanges. The final regulations provide, therefore, that in the case of simultaneous transfers of like-kind properties involving a qualified intermediary, the qualified intermediary will not be considered the agent of the taxpayer for purposes of section 1031 (a). Thus, in such a case the transfer and receipt of property by the taxpayer will be treated as an exchange. This provision is set forth in new §1.1031 (b)-2 of the final regulations and is effective for transfers of property made by taxpayers on or effective for transfers of property made by taxpayers on or after June 10, 1991. 
    In sum, while it is possible to structure a valid 1031 Exchange without engaging the services of a Qualified Intermediary, but there are some risks that certain required elements might inadvertently be missed invalidating the 1031 Exchange. Tax deferral is a gift, but to receive it, technical adherence is a necessity.  The drafters of the regulations understood this and chose to make the rules applicable to simultaneous 1031 Exchanges. The safe harbor structure set forth in the applicable regulations provide “exchange insurance” and the cost is minimal compared to the benefit of knowing the structure is preapproved.  
     
     
    The material in this blog is presented for informational purposes only. The information presented is not investment, legal, tax or compliance advice. Accruit performs the duties of a Qualified Intermediary, and as such does not offer or sell investments or provide investment, legal, or tax advice.